Henry Payne Blog
Cartoon: Lyin’ King Biden Legacy
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 8, 2025
Cartoon: Doge versus Spending
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 8, 2025
Cartoon: Mara-a-Gaza Trump
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 7, 2025
Payne: Road trippin’ in the VW ID.Buzz to frigid Ohio and back
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 7, 2025
Marysville, Ohio — The 2025 Volkswagen ID. Buzz EV has rolled up wins this auto awards season — including North American Utility of the Year — because it’s iconic, roomy and just so doggone adorable.
Though the Hoover family may disagree.
The fictional Hoovers, of course, are the most famous (infamous?) owners of a 1978 VW Microbus Type 2 (which inspired the ID.Buzz) and which co-starred in the movie “Little Miss Sunshine.” Its quirks on a cross-country trip to California are a comedic highlight of the movie, and the Hoovers would find my upgraded, $66,500 2025 ID.Buzz Pro tester a major upgrade over their ‘70s slug … except that it might be equally maddening on a long road trip.
I didn’t take the ID.Buzz cross country to a beauty pageant in Redondo Beach, but I did take it on a January adventure to see Honda’s new Marysville EV Hub (a good family destination) using, in part, General Motors Co. chargers. Indeed, the trip featured an EV trifecta — three manufacturers (VW, Honda and GM) that are among the most aggressive legacy automakers promising a transition to battery power over the next decade.
My trip was a cautionary tale on how EVs lag ICEs on range. As undeniably cool as Buzz is (I got as many looks as if I had been driving as Aston Martin DB9), it is a challenging vehicle to drive as one of its core functions: a road-trip family hauler.
Maybe there’s a script here for “Little Miss Sunshine 2.”
I filled the Buzz on my home 240-volt garage charger to 100% on a Sunday night with the goal of starting my overnight, 428-mile-round-trip-in-35-degree-winter at 7.30 p.m. Tuesday. If you have a garage and an EV, you should have a 240-volt charger for its efficiency and affordability. Charge overnight and local commutes are easy and cheap. It’s why (along with sticker shock) that EVs appeal to upper-income households — the EV is the daily driver, the gas car the trip mule.

The ID.Buzz is daring in design and even more daring for road trips. With just 234 miles of range, my rear-wheel-drive Pro model has less than half the legs of a comparable 484-mile range, gas-powered three-row VW Atlas SUV costing $45,475 — which, ahem, could make the Marysville round trip without visiting a filling station.
And with regular gas around $2.89 a gallon in Ohio, the ICE round-trip cost ($24) is 50% cheaper than the EV ($36) at fast chargers demanding about 50 cents per kWh. Oh.
My trip south was straightforward despite 50 mph wind gusts that moved the tall ID.Buzz around like it was sailboat jib. A Ford Transit panel truck passed me on I-75 and we were a comical pair blowing this way and that.

I made the trip in 4 hours and 35 minutes with two charging stops — or about an hour longer than an ICE car. Tolerable for the dysfunctional Hoover family — though I suspect mother Sheryl might have been freaked out by the second, late-night charging stop. A Blink fast charger in Dublin, Ohio, was located in a pitch-black lot next to a double-wide trailer. Eerie. I filled up for 25 minutes and was outta there.
The return trip however, would have tested the Hoovers’ patience.
For all its visual drama, the biggest advance of the ID.Buzz over the last Volkswagen EV I drove (sister ID.4) is the navigation system. It’s good. Three years ago, an ID.4 test car was unable to guide me to West Virginia on an urgent trip (I took my Tesla instead). This go-round, Buzz was nearly the Tesla’s match in mapping chargers — and exceeded the Tesla in details like allowing me to set how much charge I had when I reached my destination. With a history of bad experiences, I’ve learned to back up non-Tesla EV trips with the A Better Router Panner charging app — but the VW system was superior to ABRP.
I would need all the navi’s smarts to get home.
Rural north Columbus may be home to two ginormous Honda auto assembly plants, but like much of America, it is starved for charging infrastructure. My Dublin hotel did not have a 240-volt charger — nor did others nearby.

After briefly revisiting the eerie Blink charger Tuesday morning, I arrived for the Honda Maryville EV Hub tour with 81 miles of charge left.
OK, Hoover family, enjoy the tour and fingers crossed the navi can get us home without grandpa keeling over!
After the tour, the V-Dub charted a course of three charging stops for my trip home. Why so many for a 200-mile range vehicle for a 214-mile trip? Because batteries don’t like cold or highway speeds.

Despite a flurry of news reports claiming EVs have solved the cold range problem thanks to heat pumps, my heat pump-equipped Buzz lost 30% of range in the near-freezing temps. That is, its range was 164 miles instead of 234. Actually, 131 miles (80% of 164), since charging slows to a trickle over 80%.
Add my VW charge setting that I always arrive at a charger with at least 25 miles of range (should the charger not work and I need to find another), and the navigation system has its work cut out for it. No wonder two-car families leave the EV at home.
My first fast-charger destination after leaving Honda for my Oakland County home? A pair of ChargePoint stalls in Marysville.
The first one didn’t work.

After 15 minutes of fiddling with it, I tried the second. Success. But at pokey 62 kWh (compared to state-of-the-art 350 kWh fast chargers) the station took 33 minutes to add 70 miles.
My next charging stop (just off I-75 North in Findlay) brought a pleasant surprise: a fast charger designed like a service station gas pump. GM Energy has partnered with EVgo to create sheltered stations right next to service centers so you can plug in your car without getting rained on (looking at you, Tesla chargers) then go inside for restroom ‘n’ snack. Alas, the chargers aren’t any more reliable. After 10 minutes inside, I returned to the Buzz.
The charger had failed.
I restarted the laborious charging process, beginning with reconnecting the bulky CCS charger, which feels like you’re wrestling a boa constrictor. It would bedevil the Hoovers. “Miss Sunshine 2” would have a field day with that!
Ater 10 minutes, the charger failed again. Content that 72% of charge was enough to get me to my next (final) charging stop, I hit the road.

Happily, Buzz makes all this driving and waiting a pleasant experience. Its wood dash is lovely, and the floating center console gave me both ample kneeroom as well as cubby space. The rear two rows are just as roomy.
My final charge spot was at an EVgo charger in a McDonald’s parking lot, and I resisted the call of the Big Mac (I could put on a lot of pounds at all these charge stops). EVgo names its chargers, and this one was called “Waldo.” As in: Where’s Waldo when you need a charge?
The charger was AWOL on my first connection attempt using my EVgo charge card — but responded when I used my credit card. Yeesh. After another 20 minutes of charging, I was on the road home.
A gas car would have made the trip in 3 1/2 hours (including 15 minutes for bathroom breaks). The ID.Buzz took six hours.
VW’s reborn Microbus has come a long way in six decades. But road trips can still be a comedy of errors.
Next week: Comparo, Kia K5 vs. Toyota Camry
2025 Volkswagen ID.Buzz
Vehicle type: All-electric, rear- and all-wheel-drive, six- or seven-passenger minivan/microbus
Price: $66,045, including $1,550 destination fee (RWD Pro Plus as tested)
Powerplant: 86 kW lithium-ion battery pack mated to rear electric motors
Power: 282 horsepower, 413 pound-feet of torque (RWD)
Transmission: One-speed direct drive
Performance: 0-60 mph, 6.7 seconds (Car and Driver); top speed, 101 mph
Weight: 5,939 pounds (RWD as tested)
Fuel economy: 234-mile range (RWD)
Report card
Highs: Good navigation system; roomy, configurable interior
Lows: Low range; pricey compared to gas sibling Atlas
Overall: 3 stars
Henry Payne is auto critic for The Detroit News. Find him at hpayne@detroitnews.com or @HenryEPayne.
Cartoon: Canada Tariffs Trump Trudeau
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 5, 2025
Cartoon: Punxsutawney Philly Eagles Chiefs
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 4, 2025
Ford v Ferrari II: Ford enters top-drawer Hypercar class to win Le Mans in 2027
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 4, 2025
Charlotte, North Carolina — The golden era of Ford racing is coming back.
For the first time since the legendary GT40 dominated the 24 Hours of Le Mans in France from 1966-1969, Ford Motor Co. is returning to the pinnacle of sports car racing to take on the world. The Dearborn-based automaker announced at its annual Racing Season Launch event here that it will enter the World Endurance Championship in 2027 with a full factory LMDh Hypercar team taking on Ferrari, Porsche Penske, Cadillac and Toyota to win the world’s greatest endurance race.
“We are entering a new era for performance and racing at Ford,” said Ford chairman Bill Ford. “You can see it from what we’re doing on-road and off-road. When we race, we race to win. And there is no track or race that means more to our history than Le Mans. It is where we took on Ferrari and won in the 1960s.”

Ford enters LMDh Hypercar class to win Le Mans. Ford, Ford
The epic battle between Ford and Ferrari at Le Mans in 1966 inspired the blockbuster, Academy Award-winning movie “Ford v Ferrari” in 2019.
After the 1960s, Ford exited from the top-tier prototype class and competed in production-focused class racing around the world. In 2016, it won the Le Mans GT class with a mid-engine GT, and then finished second in the GT class last year with the debut of its Mustang GT3.
The LMDh Hypercar entry marks another level of commitment with a hybrid-powered, 670-horsepower prototype racer that has attracted the world’s best manufacturers in competition not seen since the 1960s, when Ford, Ferrari and Porsche went at it hammer-and-tong to win the top spot of Le Mans’ podium.
The Ford will hit speeds of 200 mph on Le Mans’ Mulsanne Straight while going head-to-head on strategy with the likes of Ferrari and Bloomfield Hills-based Team Penske. which manages the Porsche entry. Penske entered two Porsche 963 prototypes in 2024 in an effort to win the only major trophy that has eluded its chairman, Roger Penske, in his seven-decade racing career but was beaten to the checkered flag by Ferrari with Toyota taking second.

Ford will take on rivals including Porsche Penske, which fielded this #6 Porsche 963 last year at the 24 Hours of Le Mans in France. Chris DuMond, Special To The Detroit News
Ford did not give details on whether it will also enter the North American Weathertech Sportscar Series that shares the same Hypercar class rules for LMDh cars with WEC. Like the rear-wheel-drive Ford racer, Porsche Penske and Cadillac entries are also so-called LMDh Hypercars, which makes them eligible for the 24 Hours of Daytona (that Porsche Penske just won last weekend) and the Detroit Grand Prix in June.
Ferrari and Toyota, on the other hand, have produced so-called LMH Hypercars, which are only eligible for the international WEC series because their hybrid systems drive all four wheels and have unlimited development budgets. An LMDh car is capped at a cost of about $1 million.
The distinction was crucial in 2024 as the Ferrari and Toyota LMH Hypercars had better traction and higher straight-line speeds compared to LMDh entries. Stewards are expected to address such disparities in coming years for fairness and competition.
Chairman Ford has been passionate about motor racing, which has informed the family brand since the company’s founding in 1903. The passion runs deep as his son, Will Ford, became general manager of Ford’s racing division, Ford Performance, in 2023. The pair have presided over an expansion of Ford into international motorsport in off-road racing, with a Ford Raptor finishing third in Saudi Arabia’s Dakar Rally this year — and now the announcement that the brand is entering WEC in both the Hypercar and GT categories.

24 Hours of Le Mans 2024: The #2 Cadillac V-Series.R started 7th and finished 7th. Henry Payne, The Detroit News
“I am thrilled that we’re going back to Le Mans and competing at the highest level of endurance racing. We are ready to once again challenge the world, and ‘go like hell!’” said Chairman Ford, referencing the “Go Like Hell” book that catalogued Ford’s 1966 Le Mans win.
Ford’s announcement was met with cheers across the globe.
“It is wonderful news to welcome Ford back to the top level of the 24 Hours of Le Mans for the first time in almost 60 years,” said Pierre Fillon, president of the Automobile Club de l’Ouest, which oversees the Le Mans race. “It is a brand that has always had a close affinity with this very special race, and history shows that Ford does not compete to finish second. The renewal of its famous rivalry with Ferrari is truly an exciting prospect.”
Other manufacturers that have entered the WEC series include BMW, Peugeot and Lamborghini.
“(Ford’s) return to the highest level of the discipline is further validation of the success and appeal of the current Hypercar regulations,” said President Richard Mille of the FIA Endurance Commission, which is the licensing body for international motorsport. “Endurance racing’s golden age is right here, and right now!”
Henry Payne is auto critic for The Detroit News. Find him at hpayne@detroitnews.com or @HenryEPayne.
Payne: Electric Jeep Wagoneer S is fast and luxurious
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 4, 2025
San Diego — Jeep makes rowdy, off-road dirt kickers that can be stripped of their doors in the wilderness so you can hear the call of the Curve-billed Thrasher, the splash of mud under 33-inch tires and the bellow of a Hemi V-8 at full throttle. ROOOOWWWRRRR!
The Jeep Wagoneer S is not that vehicle.
The brand’s first electric vehicle is the gateway to Jeep’s luxurious Wagoneer sub-brand and it is quiet. Cradled in my double-stitched Cabo Vinyl throne, I cupped the two-spoke steering wheel in one hand and cruised silently along the California coast. Doors on, of course, for a hushed cabin so I could hear the stirring intro to U2’s “Where the Streets Have No Name” through 19 McIntosh speakers. S is for silent.
This bliss is only interrupted by the violent, instant-torque acceleration that is also synonymous with luxury today.
SCREEEEEEE! I stomped the accelerator out of a Carlsbad stoplight and my tall, Arizona Arnold Palmer can jumped out of its console cupholder and dumped tea and lemonade all over the faux leather. SCREEEEEEE! The overwhelmed 9.3-inch Falken all-season tires shrieked all the way to 40 mph under the strain of 617 pound-feet of torque, laying rubber past 60 mph in just 3.4 seconds. A Jeep record, beating the legendary Hellcat-V8-powered Grand Cherokee Trackhawk beast’s 3.5 seconds.
Violence has a way of exposing flaws, and the S needs snugger cupholders and wider tires. Otherwise, this is a first-class Jeep that will strut into the golf club alongside any BMW, Volvo or Caddy.
Electric is the new luxury and Jeep is there. As it has been for some time with its gas models, Jeep is the rare mainstream brand that is shopped alongside European luxury.
Rupert, should I get a BMW X5, Audi Q5 or Jeep Grand Cherokee?

The Jeep is deserving. Check out the $65K Grand Cherokee Summit Reserve’s thin waterfall console display and thin headlights. Jeep’s mega-ute twins — Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer — take that luxe to another level with appointments like interior wood trim, console icebox and acres of screens.
The S is the gateway to Wagoneer world, and my loaded, 72 grand S Launch Edition is the patriarch of a coming family of models. Think of Jeep as a full-line SUV brand — Compass, (coming) Cherokee replacement, Grand Cherokee — with a passion for off-roading and luxury. The Wrangler and Wagoneer embody those passions.
The Wagoneer S is effortless to drive with superb interior ergonomics (including a Corvette-like square steering wheel for better instrument visibility) instant torque and liquid-smooth drivetrain. No downshift hiccups, no noise, no STOP-START stalls at stoplights. S for serene.

It’s also the same as every other EV in the $70K competitive set: Cadillac Lyriq, BMW i4, Mercedes EQE, Audi Q4 e-Tron, Polestar 4, Tesla Model Y. Luxe brands once differentiated themselves with spicy V-8s, inline-6s, supercharged-turbocharged turbo-4s. Now they’re homogeneous recipes.
In the EV segment, presentation is more important than ever. Design rules.
And Wagoneer S has it in spades. Welcome to the world of exterior and interior architects Vince Gallante and Ryan Nagode. Like New York fashion designers, they make Jeep stand out like Lauren, Hilfiger, LaCoste. Look for the signature alligator on the pocket.
In the case of Jeep, the alligator is its seven-slot grille up front. But what is a grille for if it doesn’t feed air to a gas engine behind it? Fashion. Like BMW’s kidneys, the seven slots are design elements integrated with the headlights that glow day and night. Designer Gallante was inspired by the recessed lighting at the upscale Shinola Hotel in Detroit. S is for Shinola.

Jeep also means boxy, which clashes with EV needs for low drag-coefficient to maximize range. S checks the utility box with healthy interior legroom and cargo (including 3 cubic-feet of frunk space to isolate smelly items like athletic shoes or diapers), though its sleek bullet nose and raked rear glass are more Tesla than Jeep.
Designer answer? A big rear spoiler, which both squared off the slanted rear window and also assisted airflow. Dress S in a yin-yang wardrobe of black roof/white body/black wheels like my tester, and it’s fit for the red carpet at a movie screening.
Speaking of screens, the interior has more monitors than a TV production room: 12.3-inch instrument cluster, 10-inch head-up display, 12.3-inch infotainment display, 10.3-inch climate display (think Audi, a first for Jeep) and 11-inch passenger display. They’re digital, loaded with content … and essential for EV navigation.
Riding shotgun east of San Diego, I used the passenger screen to chart a mock trip to Las Vegas. Then, with the press of a button, sent the route to the driver’s instrument cluster and center console screens. My expert navigator Mrs. Payne would love that.
Vegas was 323 miles way and I had just 242 miles on the battery. I’d need to charge on the way.

Like Tesla and Cadillac Google-Built-in navi systems, the Jeep included charge stops on the way. With a twist. Conveniently, S allows you to set the state of charge you’d like to have when you arrive at your destination so that you’re not gasping for electrons on arrival (I chose 30%) — and then sets the route.
To maximize time, Wagoneer S planned two fast-charger stops of 20 and 28 minutes each — adding 48 minutes to the 4.5-hour drive. Not very luxurious. And S lacks a hands-free driving system like its Cadillac and Tesla competitors that makes long trips more relaxing. Worse, when I navigated to a local La Jolla fast charger for a charging test, the charger was out of order.
Which is another reason that EVs have found their niche in the luxury space — most owners have multi-car garages, so they can install a 240-volt charger for local commutes (Jeep will throw in $600), then take, say, their gas-fired 600-mile-range Grand Cherokee on road trips to Vegas.
The 617-torque Wagoneer shares its STLA Large electric platform with Dodge’s first EV, the 650-torque Charger Daytona, and could use the Dodge’s wider 12.3-inch rear tires for Woodward stoplight launches. But at a porky 5,667-pounds, the Wagoneer S — like Charger Daytona EV — didn’t tempt hooliganism in the twisties.
Neither did it tempt me to go off-road.
I set the regen pedal to max for one-pedal driving, turned on a lower seat massage, opened the panoramic roof and enjoyed the drive. S is for spoiled.
Next week: 2025 Nissans remade, Murano and Armada
2024 Jeep Wagoneer S
Vehicle type: Battery-powered, all-wheel-drive, five-passenger SUV
Price: $71,995, including $1,795 destination fee (as tested)
Powerplant: 100-kWh lithium-ion battery with dual electric-motor drive
Power: 600 horsepower, 617 pound-feet torque
Transmission: Single-speed direct drive
Performance: 0-60 mph, 3.4 seconds (mfr.); top speed, 132 mph; towing, 3,500 pounds
Weight: 5,667 pounds
Fuel economy: EPA MPGe 97; range, 303 miles
Report card
Highs: Awesome acceleration; screen-tastic interior
Lows: Too much power for tires; no access to reliable Tesla charger network yet
Overall: 3 stars
Henry Payne is auto critic for The Detroit News. Find him at hpayne@detroitnews.com or @HenryEPayne.
Cartoon: Trump Takes Out Pronouns
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 4, 2025
Cartoon: Bishop Scolds Trump Melania Immigration
Posted by Talbot Payne on February 4, 2025
Cartoon: COVIDnam Fauci Pardon
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 25, 2025
Cartoon: Bureaucrat Bowl Trump DC
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 25, 2025
Cartoon: Biden Oligarchy
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 23, 2025
Cartoon: Trump Pardons J6
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 23, 2025
Payne: VW Taos upgrades looks, vroom to match its room
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 23, 2025
San Antonio, Texas — I’d like to start my review of the 2025 Volkswagen Taos subcompact SUV from the backseat.
It’s terrific. I can easily sit behind myself. I’m 6’5” and my knees don’t even touch the seatback in front of me. I can cross my legs, and my giraffe neck isn’t stuffed into the roof. In fact, I have plenty of headroom under the panoramic glass roof. That’s right, a panorama roof in a $32,025 SUV, a rare find in this subcompact segment.
My reviews of compact V-Dubs usually start in the front seat of terrific corner carvers like the Golf GTI/Golf R hot hatches or Jetta GLI pocket rocket. But the Taos is no more interested in carving corners than roast beef. Happy to leave the motorhead antics to its car brethren, the SUV aspires to be a vintage V-Dub like a Microbus: affordable, entry-level utility vehicle.
In a market buffeted by high electric vehicle-development costs, government mandates and product cancellations, one of the most pleasing trends in recent years has been the burst of affordable new entry-level utes. Not just affordable, but loaded with a Santa’s workshop full of goodies. Utes like the quick Mazda CX-30, rugged Subaru Crosstrek and 2023 Detroit News Vehicle of the Year, Chevy Trax.
Like its fellow mega-brand Chevrolet, Volkswagen has bet the farm on EVs and has been rolling out expensive SUVs like the (Microbus-inspired) $60K ID.Buzz and $45K ID.4 while ditching more affordable sedans like the Passat and Golf. Customers can be forgiven for thinking the German brand had pivoted from affordable bratwurst offerings to a premium menu of Jäeger Schnitzel with Paprika Mushroom Sauce entrees.
The 2025 Taos is a welcome reminder that VW makes good brat ‘n’ potato salad for the whole family.
Buried in San Antonio rush hour traffic, my Taos tester (starting price, $26,420) was bubble-wrapped in standard safety equipment including forward collision alert, blind-spot assist, lane-keep-assist and adaptive cruise control. If I was also being buried by snow (instead of bathing in Texas sunshine) I would add all-wheel drive for 1,700 bucks for a total of $28,120.
I was a fan from Day One, 2021 when VW introduced its first subcompact SUV to the U.S. Its interior room, generous standard features and all-digital displays were fundamentals sorely needed in an entry-level segment aimed at single-car families who prize utility.

Check the affordability box, and you have a gateway drug to the similarly roomy Tiguan compact and three-row Atlas SUVs. VW has become a split personality brand of fun toys like the 241-horse Golf GTI and 228-horsepower Jetta GLI and the Atlas rolling living room. Taos was definitely a Son of Atlas, but still noticeably light on grunt. I mean, 158 horsepower? Seriously?
For Taos 2.0, VW engineers have injected the 1.5-liter turbo-4 with a dose of steroids to 174 ponies. That’s more like it.
When the traffic cleared, I nailed the throttle and the V-Dub leapt forward, its eight-speed automatic transmission smoothly throwing off shifts before I settled at 75 mph and set cruise control again. You won’t get the cheerful exhaust grunt or handling of the GTI/GLI hellions, but Taos has raided their wardrobes for a more athletic look.

The lumpy fascia has been cleaned up with a leaner, more horizonal grille and taillight elements (similar to Jetta, which also got needed facelift this year). Combined with toned shoulders and front hood, the Taos looks much healthier to go with its improved power.
The facelift continues inside, where Taos complements its standard tech with a tablet infotainment screen for the Gen-X laptop generation. Taos could use more console room (how about freeing up space with that nifty steering column-mounted shifter in the ID products?) to match its legroom, but it was enough space to keep my smartphone charged in a day of driving.
Taos does not suffer the ID models’ battery range anxiety, and I set off into the Texas wilderness with 360 miles of gas range and no worries of finding a filling station.

My smartphone wirelessly took over the dash displays, navigating to my destination while synching to my Google cloud account’s Sirius XM stations, contacts and so on.
But the steering wheel is my favorite feature.
It comes heated standard to warm up my cold mitts on a 40-degree December morning (20 degrees back home in Detroit), and its cornucopia of features means you don’t have to remove your hands to operate the automobile.
With my right thumb, I toggled through my favorite radio stations. With my left thumb, I adjusted volume. Cruise control buttons are intuitively arranged on the left spoke, so I never had to look away from the road, and the right spoke allowed me to thumb through screen menu items like Google Map directions and tire pressure. Like all VWs, the Taos has one glaring ergonomic omission — no radio mute button. Odd.

The Taos should be attractive to young couples given its price point — but also to empty-nesters looking to downsize. Why drive a supersized two-row Atlas Cross Sport when the Taos easily swallows four passengers? For such customers, Taos offers premium goodies like the panoramic roof, a blue interior and fancy 19-inch wheels on the top-grade SEL trim. My Moss Green, SE Black model was pretty stylish too, at just over $32K.
Taos has stepped up its game in a ferociously competitive segment. Once known for stubbornly resisting American driver preferences, this little brat is as American as a Big Mac. It even has condiments like a spare tire under the rear hatch.
In case I got a flat in the Texas boonies.
Next week: 2025 Jeep Wagoner S
2025 Volkswagen Taos
Vehicle type: Front-engine, front- and-all-wheel-drive, five-passenger compact SUV
Price: $26,420, including $1,425 destination fee ($32,025 FWD SE Black as tested)
Powerplant: 1.5-liter turbo-4 cylinder
Power: 174 horsepower, 184 pound-feet torque
Transmission: Eight-speed automatic
Performance: 0-60 mph, 7.0 seconds (Car and Driver est.); top speed, 125 mph
Weight: 3,300-3,600 pounds (est.)
Fuel economy: EPA est. 28 city/36 highway/31 combined (FWD); mpg 25 city/33 highway/28 combined (AWD)
Report card
Highs: Roomy interior; more athletic look
Lows: Lacks joy-to-drive of Golf/Jetta siblings; mute button, please
Overall: 3 stars
Henry Payne is auto critic for The Detroit News. Find him at hpayne@detroitnews.com or @HenryEPayne.
Cartoon: Biden Crime Family Pardon
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 22, 2025
Cartoon: Fauci Snake Oil Pardon
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 20, 2025
Cartoon: Trump Inauguration Stops Warming
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 20, 2025
Cartoon: LA Fire Newsom Climate Sacrifice
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 18, 2025
Cartoon: Zeldin EPA Woke Climate
Posted by Talbot Payne on January 18, 2025