Dick Cheney, anti-corporate activist ( The Michigan View 08.31.11)
Posted by hpayne on August 31, 2011
Aren’t Republicans supposed to be slaves to Big Corporations? To Wall Street? To rich CEOs?
So how come Democrats’ bête noire, Darth Vader Cheney himself- opposed bailing out the biggest crony of them all, General Motors?
Of course, that’s not how Democrats (or most folks in Michigan) will react to today’s revelation from The Detroit News’ Dave Shepardson that in his new memoir, “Cheney says he disagreed with President George W. Bush’s decision to rescue GM with a $13.4 billion bailout in the final days of his term.”
The Big Three are synonymous with Big Labor and therefore should help themselves to the public trough, goes conventional liberal wisdom. But who’s really looking out for the little guy here? Contrary to Halliburton caricature, Cheney took the taxpayer’s point of view: GM should fix their mistakes. That’s how the market works.
Politically, of course, neither Bush (nor any other president) would have left GM hanging in the midst of a financial crisis. “The president decided that he did not want to pull the plug on General Motors as we were headed out the door,” Cheney writes.
But in so doing, GM also missed a golden opportunity to rid itself of its historic disadvantage against America’s foreign transplants: the UAW.
That ball and chain is back with a vengeance as UAW Chief Bob King is putting renewed pressure on the Big Three to raise wages because “we’re very concerned about that entry-level member having a middle-class standard of living.” So much for wanting to make the industry competitive. King is a headache GM’s competition doesn’t have to wake up to every morning.
“I would have preferred that the government not get involved and was disappointed,” writes Cheney, “when the Obama administration significantly increased the government intervention in the automobile industry shortly after taking office.”
The Democratic Party – slave to corporate America.


